Introduction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An International Classification of the best three years old and four years old and upwards having run in 1977 in France, Great Britain and Ireland was published for the first time in December 1977. The principle of the introduction of such a Classification had been agreed at the International Stewards' Meeting held in Dublin in July 1977. Then the details were finalised at a meeting in Paris in November 1977 between the official handicappers of the countries concerned. This classification has been designated :
It was used also to show the relative quality of the breeding in the three countries concerned. *
The critical developments to the International Classifications lead by the growing of international racing :
* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Problems were encountered in the formation of the International Classifications (IC) back in 1977 and in subsequent years as the IC expanded to include new countries. Firstly a similar Ratings scale for each country had to be implemented. That was not a problem with the three founding countries in 1977 but not every additional country that joined the International Classifications operated in a similar manner. North America had no Rating System in existence until they joined the World Ranking Supervisory Conference. They however formed the North American Rating Committee (NARC) and developed an International Rating scale similar to Europe. Other countries such as Japan, U.A.E. and Hong Kong, also initiated an International Classification Rating Scale in their countries so that the World Ranking Supervisory Conference could asses all eligible horses for inclusion into the International Classification. Likewise in the Asian Racing Federation region, Handicappers have adopted the International Classification Scale for assessing horses in their Group/Graded races. Work is progressing so that within a short space of time countries like Singapore, Australia and New Zealand will have a compatible International Rating system. When North America joined the IC, two issues had to be resolved. Firstly, how to treat the form of horses that race on "Turf" and "Dirt"? The International Classifications treated the form on these surfaces independently, so horses were given either a Dirt Rating or a Turf Rating. Secondly, an issue that is highly emotive, medication. The Handicappers based their Ratings purely on the results of the races so medication was not an issue for the World Ranking Supervisory Conference. The sales companies adopt a similar stance, as there is no reference to medication in the pedigree or bloodline analysis pages * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What are the practical uses for International Classification :
*
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Future Racing has become an International sport and has to compete with the likes of Formula One, Tennis, Golf, Soccer, Rugby and Athletics. There are other sports that could be mentioned but what they all have in common is that they are attracting not just a local audience but a huge international following. The major sports have some mechanism as to demonstrate their "Champions" and so should Racing. There is a need for both National and International "Champions" to give racing a higher profile on a world-wide bases. Racing has the mechanism already in place with the International Classifications. However, the IC should be a true reflection of the top horses throughout the world not just in one or two continents. * * * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Conference was chaired from 1989 to 1995 by Capt. Michael BYRNE and from 1996 to 2001, by Mr Geoffrey GIBBS. * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The 2002 World Ranking Supervisory Conference was held in Paris from 2 to 9 December to compile the 2002 International Classifications which have been published in the 2003 International Cataloguing Standards Book available at The Jockey Club Information Systems. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|